Category Archives: Jeff Halper

Normalising Apartheid: The Greatest Threat to the Palestinians since 1948

This two-page summary, prepared by ICAHD and Jeff Halper, sums up concisely where we are in the political moment in the struggle for a decolonized and free Palestine, which we hope you will consider and share.

As the page shows, we are in a confused but crucial moment between two initiatives that are coming down the pipeline and are being integrated — Trump/Netanyahu’s plan of normalization with the European/Saudi need for a Palestinian state (what I call a “good enough” Palestinian state, a Bantustan) — and the still embryonic, perhaps fantastical one-state idea, which, for all its far-fetchedness, is truly the only just and workable way out. So the page is a kind of combined reality-check of where we are politically and a warning that we are in the danger of being overtaken by events. Normalization is a closure. It is imposed by the US, Israel and the Arab states (plus other Muslim countries like Indonesia, Pakistan and Kazakhstan), not negotiated, and the Palestinians have little if any say. And after normalization, little space exists for furthering political struggle.

We may say, OK, let’s go with the flow. Apartheid is inevitable. Palestinian civil society and all of us, supporters of the Palestinians in their struggle for liberation, is simply not able to make its voice heard, fragmented and so harshly repressed as it is by both Israel and the Palestinian Authority. And so the Palestinians have no end-game of their own, the one-state idea far from being agreed-upon and formulated into a political program around which their supporters can be mobilized. When the Abraham Accords are imposed and apartheid becomes a reality, then, we can simply shift to an anti-apartheid struggle a la the ANC in South Africa. The Palestinians will then, with no choice, have the same end-game: decolonization (but more complete than what was done in South Africa) leading to a democracy based on one person, one vote.

There is a fatal flaw in this (sort of) strategy, however. While the international community refused to recognize the Bantustans in South Africa and finally rejected the apartheid regime, in the case of the Palestinians and Israel it will accept a Palestinian Bantustan as part of a “two-state solution” if only to wash its hands of this persky nuisance and move on to more weighty issues, like consolidating the rising Israeli/Saudi hegemony over the region as a NATO counterweight to China. Accepting and normalizing Israeli apartheid is a small price to pay. Good enough.

All this is to question whether a post-normalization strategy in fact exists; indeed, whether any political space exists after normalization, since normalization is, well, normalization. it’s done, it’s a closure, the international community has moved on. If we don’t try (and succeed) to block the vehicle of normalization, the impending Abraham Accords, I really wonder whether we have run out of political space for further struggle. Will the Palestinian people, despite the fervent support they enjoy from the peoples of the world, be able to continue their struggle, first and foremost against the very collaborationist Bantustan government the Abraham Accords will establish?

There is an urgency here. The Palestinian struggle is in danger of being overtaken by events. We do not determine the political timetable. Palestinian agency as expressed in the BDS movement, in film and literature, in sumud and resistance on the ground, in rallies and protests abroad must, in the end — and urgently — be accompanied by a political program, an end-game, with which to push back against the normalization of Israeli apartheid and effectively mobilize the global forces that played such a key role in defeating apartheid in South Africa.

This ICAHD page attempts to focus on the political moment we are in and the immediate threat normalization poses. Indeed, we argue that normalization represents the greatest threat to the Palestinian people since the Nakba. It also points to where, in our view and that of our Palestinian partners, the struggle should be going. A useful appraisal of the political moment, I hope, but an urgent warning as well. Please circulate.

Download a Pdf version of this ICAHD resource

Challenging Two State Apartheid

Jeff Halper on why we must challenge a US imposed ‘Two State Apartheid’ in Palestine

Jeff Halper elaborates on the Genocide Convention and its applicability to Israel’s actions in Gaza

To receive the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (ICAHD) monthly updates (including Jeff’s latest video) click here and scroll to the bottom of the homepage.

Inevitable Solutions to the Palestinian Plight

May I begin by thanking Professor Datuk Azizian Baharuddin, the director of Universiti Malaya Centre for Civilisational Dialogue (UMCCD), for the kind invitation to give this lecture. I also wish to thank Norma Hashim and Professor Dr Mohd Nazari Ismail of the Hashim Sani Centre for Palestine Studies for co-hosting this lecture and also for sponsoring my visit.

Over thirty years ago I gave an annual lecture to 16–17-year-old students at Guildford Grammar School, on virtually the same subject as we are considering today. I began by warning the students that there would be homework to motivate them to pay attention. And I say the same to you today – there will be homework.

The title I have been given is “Inevitable Solutions to the Palestinian Plight”. Note the first two words – ‘Inevitable” and “Solutions” because there are many solutions to the Palestinian plight. I will major on three today. These three are in fact mutually exclusive. How then can they be inevitable? That in part depends on you, me and seven billion other people in the world. Let me illustrate. Climate change is inevitable, it is happening, but the solutions (and there are several) depend on us and how seriously we adjust our values, our priorities and life styles. So it is with resolving the Palestinian plight. 

You may download a pdf version of this lecture here.

Continue reading

ICAHD Calls for an End to Israeli Genocide Against the Palestinian People

The term “genocide” was formulated by the Jewish-Polish lawyer Raphael Lemkin against the backdrop of the Holocaust. It was codified as a crime under international law in the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (the Genocide Convention). The definition of genocide, as set out in Article 2 of the Convention, is simple and straightforward, its first three elements clearly reflecting Israeli policies and actions towards the Palestinian people since initiating its process of systematic genocide in 1947:

Genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction
in whole or in part.

Continue reading

Jeff Halper on Netanyahu’s Pandora’s Box

An update from Jeff Halper, the director of the Israeli Committee Against House demolitions (ICAHD), on the situation in Israel/Palestine. This is the first of what will be a monthly update I am recording with Jeff about what is happening on the ground in Palestine/Israel.

This month Jeff speaks about the push of international right-wing organisations to change the face of democracy in the world, with Netanyahu and his group leaders in this effort. However, Netanyahu’s agenda has fractured Israeli society and coming to the surface are questions about how Israel can be a democracy with an occupation and apartheid policies. Jeff goes on to speak about the heighten repression of the Palestinians during Ramadan and again calls for the UN to provide protective presence for the Palestinians.

Please become a member of ICAHD and receive the monthly Newsletter and Bulletin.