Hal Lindsey (b. 1930) The Father of Apocalyptic Christian Zionism

1. The Significance of Hal Lindsey to Christian Zionism

Hal Lindsey is undoubtedly the most influential of all fundamentalist Christian Zionists of the 20th century. Although rarely quoted by other dispensationalists, he has been described by Time Magazine as 'The Jeremiah for this Generation', by the New York Times as 'the best selling author of the decade.'1 His own publisher describes Lindsey as 'The Father of the Modern-Day Bible Prophecy Movement,'2 and, 'the best known prophecy teacher in the world.'3 He was apparently one of few authors to have three books on the New York Times bestseller list at the same time.4

Lindsey is indeed a prolific writer, the author of at least eighteen books spanning 27 years, most of which deal directly or indirectly with a dispensational interpretation of biblical prophecy and Christian Zionism.5 He hosts his own radio6 and television programmes, leads annual pro-Israeli Holy Land tours, and by subscription makes available a monthly Christian Intelligence Journal called Countdown as well as the International Intelligence Briefing. He is also a regular contributor along with fellow Zionist, Grant Jeffries, on the fundamentalist Trinity Broadcasting Network television station, which broadcasts Lindsey's weekly International Intelligence Briefing programme.7

Lindsey's most famous book, The Late Great Planet Earth has been described by the New York Times as the '#1 Non-fiction Bestseller of the Decade.' It has gone through more than 108 printings with sales, by 1993, of more than 18 million copies in English, with estimates varying between 25-30 million copies in 31 foreign editions.8 Despite dramatic changes in the world since its publication in 1970, Lindsey maintains that the prophetic and apocalyptic scenario depicted is biblically accurate and therefore the book remains in print in its original unrevised form.

Sales of Lindsey's doomsday book increased 83% during August and September 1990 amidst fears in the United States that Saddam Hussein would drag the world toward total world war. Paul Van Duinen, an executive of Lindsey's publishers, Zondervan, admitted, ' Often times we see during a crisis that people more actively turn toward God and things spiritual.'9

Lindsey's popularity may be attributed to a combination of his readable, almost fictional style of writing, his imaginative if apocalyptic interpretation of contemporary events which he claims are fulfilling predictions made by the Hebrew prophets, and his assertion that the end of the world is just around the corner.

A further reason for his popularity may have to do with his tendency to rewrite his predictions in the light of changing events. So for example The Final Battle (1994) is essentially a rewrite of the 'Late Great Planet Earth' (1970); 'Apocalypse Code' (1997) is a rewrite of 'There's a New World Coming' (1973); and 'Planet Earth 2000 A.D.' is a rewrite of 'The 1980's Countdown to Armageddon' (1980). Unless people have access to all Lindsey's books they would not necessarily be aware of this as he is reluctant to acknowledge how he has adapted his material to fit the changing world political scene. The introductions to two of his books gives a good example of his approach. Reading Planet Earth 2000 A.D. one would be forgiven for thinking this was the long awaited sequel to The Late Great Planet Earth. Not so, and Lindsey even hints, in the latter, as to why.

1980's Countdown to Armageddon Planet Earth 2000 A.D.
Ever since The Late Great Planet Earth I have thought about writing another book on how prophecy relates to current events.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But only recently have I felt compelled to do so. So many of the things which have occurred during the past 10 years are so directly related to prophecy that I now sense an urgent, even desperate compulsion to bring readers up to date.

 

The goal of this book is not merely to show which prophecies have been fulfilled since Late Great came out in 1970, however. Even more important, it is intended to analyze what will occur in the decade we have just entered...

 

The decade of the 1980's could very well be the last decade of history as we know it.10

Meanwhile, for 25 years I resisted the mammoth undertaking of writing a book that would go beyond where The Late Great Planet Earth left off, mostly because prophetically meaningful events were occurring so quickly, I wasn't sure how a book could do justice to the subject. Instead of focussing on writing prophecy books that might be out of date by the time they reached the stores, I devoted my attention to radio and television shows, video and audio tapes and a monthly news and prophecy journal. Only now, as mankind approaches the third millennium, do I feel like the Holy Spirit has provided me with the proper perspective - the Big Picture, so to speak - on the mind blowing experiences of the modern world...

This book doesn't dwell on the past, it looks to the future. Because we are so close to the final, climactic stages of world history, it is considerably easier today for the student of Bible prophecy to see with some accuracy what's coming next...

I am certain... The Second Advent will occur in the next few years - probably in your lifetime.11

The influence Christian Zionists such as Hal Lindsey have, or have had, in American political circles is highlighted by Don Wagner who claims that in 1980,

 'White House Seminars' became a regular feature of Reagan's administration bringing Lindsey into direct personal contact with national and Congressional leaders. Lindsey subsequently became a consultant on Middle Eastern affairs not only to the Pentagon but also to the Israeli Government.13

  2. Lindsey's Literalistic Dispensational Hermeneutic

 Lindsey attributes the development of erroneous views about Israel to an allegorical, non-literal hermeneutic allegedly popularised by Origen.

The man most responsible for changing the way the Church interpreted prophecy is Origen... [He] powerfully introduced, taught and spread the allegorical method of interpreting the Scriptures, particularly in the area of prophecy. From this seemingly harmless fact of Church history evolved a system of prophetic interpretation that created the atmosphere in which 'Christian' anti-Semitism took root and spread. Using this method of prophetic interpretation, Church theologians began to develop the idea that the Israelites had permanently forfeited all their covenants by rejecting Jesus as the Messiah.14

As has already been shown, it was the consistent approach of the Post-Apostolic Fathers to interpret the Hebrew Scriptures typologically as the Apostles had done before them15 . In his quest for literalism, Lindsey fails profoundly to appreciate the distinction between figurative or typological employed by covenantal theologians and allegorical methods of interpretation seen typically in pre-Reformation Roman Catholicism.16

Demar and Leithart clearly show that a typological interpretation of the Old Testament was consistently followed by the Church from the 1st Century, and did not arise with Origen as Lindsey superficially alleges. Indeed they show how,

  Ironically, Lindsey confesses to indulging in the use of typology when it is convenient. In explaining his hermenutical approach to the Book of Revelation, Lindsey makes a number of assumptions,

 Lindsey's hermeneutics on occasions is more eisegesis than exegesis, in that he reads into biblical texts material that is not there in the original. Occasionally this includes adding words to the text. So for example, in quoting Ezekiel 38:15-16, Lindsey adds the word 'Russia' to reinforce his interpretation.

 3. Lindsey's Unconventional View of Prophecy

  Integral to his literalist hermeneutic, Lindsey has largely been responsible for popularising a somewhat dubious and sensationalist approach to eschatology. In his first work, The Late Great Planet Earth, Lindsey surveys the apparent revival in interest in astrology, spiritualism and clairvoyancy. He then confidently asserts,

In his third book, There's A New World Coming: A Prophetic Odessey, published three years later in 1973, Lindsey persists in taking a comparative approach to prophecy, likening the claims of the Old Testament prophets to those of the druids of Stonehenge.

It seems that Lindsey perceives of biblical prophecy as differing from occult prophecy primarily in terms of greater accuracy rather than contrasting their source of inspiration. Ironically, the last chapter of The Late Great Planet Earth is entitled, 'Polishing the Crystal Ball,' 24 while a paragraph heading in There's a New World Coming, describing the Book of Revelation, is entitled, 'John's Chain of ESP'.25

  Lindsey makes a second questionable assumption regarding prophecy. He assumes that biblical prophecy is essentially futuristic and predictive, the foretelling of the future, and the future of the State of Israel, in particular.

Following Darby, Lindsey believes 'prophecy is prewritten history'.29 This is a profound and fundamental error. The Hebrew prophets consistently indicate that their purpose was to call the people of God back to the terms of their covenant relationship. Their role was not simply to reveal arbitrary and otherwise hidden facts about future events.

  The prophet speaks the Word of God. He appeals to his people to be true to Yahweh, the God of the covenant. Thus he functions within a covenant context. He comes to his people with a threat or with words of comfort. Insofar as his message touches on the future, he does point to events down the road. But the prophet never makes predictions as such. His message is conditional; it is tied in with God's promises, on the one hand, and his threats, on the other.30

  Authentic prophecy in Scripture was always conditional rather than fatalistic and always given within the context of the covenant between God and his chosen people.

  Lindsey fails to recognise the intrinsic connection between covenant relationship and prophetic message. He therefore misunderstands the intention of the prophets who were not primarily concerned with predicting future events, satisfying our curiosity, or giving an 'exciting view'32 of human destiny, but with leading God's covenant people to repentance and change.

Hal Lindsey claims to have uncovered prophetic puzzles throughout the Bible. Hidden away within these puzzles are specific predictions concerning the present and imminent future. In the wake of the 'Bible Code' debate, Lindsey capitalised on the speculation by rewriting There's a New World Coming. He renamed it, Apocalypse Code claiming to have deciphered, 'long-hidden messages about man's future and the fate of the earth.'34

To do so Lindsey performs 'acrobatic stunts',35 twisting biblical texts to fit his future scenario, propounding nothing less than what critics regard as a 'new form of Christian Gnosticism,'36 since he reveals a knowledge of the future which only those who heed his books will understand.

 

4. The Distinctive Apocalyptic Zionism of Hal Lindsey

The titles of Lindsey's books show an increasingly exaggerated and almost pathological voyeurism regarding the apocalyptic.39 His books are replete with dogmatic and categorical assertions that biblical prophecy is being fulfilled in his generation signalling the imminent destruction of the world and return of Christ.

  We are the generation the prophets were talking about. We have witnessed biblical prophecies come true. The birth of Israel. The decline in American power and morality. The rise of Russian and Chinese might. The threat of war in the Middle East. The increase of earthquakes, volcanoes, famine and drought. The Bible foretells the signs that precede Armageddon... We are the generation that will see the end times... and the return of Jesus.40

Lindsey has been described as, 'a long haired reincarnation of Scofield.'41 This may be because of the marked similarities between the pessimistic world views resented by the two authors.

 

Cyrus Scofield (1918) Hal Lindsey (1970)
    So far as the prophetic Word has spoken there is not the least warrant for the expectation that the nations engaged in the present gigantic struggle will or can make a permanent peace.
    It is fondly dreamed that out of all the suffering and carnage and destruction of this war will be born such a hatred of war as will bring to pass a federation of the nations-The United States of the World-in which will exist but one army, and that an international peace, rather than an army... For that Word certainly points to a federated world-empire in the end-time of the age...
    It is, of course, possible, nay, probable that some temporary truce may end, or suspend for a time, the present world-war, for ten kingdoms will exist at the end-time in the territory once ruled over by Rome.42
    In spite of the vain striving of man, of the bold and infamous conquerors throughout the ages who failed in their human attempts, we are beginning to see the Ancient Roman Empire draw together, just as predicted... We believe that the Common Market and the trend toward unification in Europe may well be the beginning of the ten-nation confederacy predicted by Daniel and the Book of Revelation... In spite of those who propose the alternatives to the United States of Europe, and the temporary setbacks it appears to have, it seems that the trend is ever onward... At about 1980 we may fully expect the great fusion of all economic, military, and political communities into the United States of Europe... Imagine that. A "ten-nation economic entity." Is it any wonder that men who have studied prophecy for many years believe that the basic beginning of the unification of Europe has begun?43

 

Lindsey's last but one book, The Final Battle, is a good example. It includes this statement on the cover,

Lindsey asserts that the world is degenerating and that the forces of evil manifest in godless Communism and militant Islam are the real enemies of Israel. An apocalyptic scenario is predicted, centred upon a great battle at Megiddo between massive international armies that will attempt but fail to destroy Israel.

Based on his interpretation of Ezekiel 38 & 39, and selective quotations from speculative 19th Century commentators, Lindsey insists the references to Gog, Rosh and Tubal reveal that the chief enemy of Israel in the final days will be Russia.

Lindsey's exegetical approach here is very similar to that of the British Israel movement,46 taking predictions made about the enemies of Israel in Ezekiel's day and of the Church in Revelation and applying them to contemporary Britain, the United States and Israel.

For example, Lindsey offers detailed illustrated plans showing future military movements of armies and naval convoys, including the American 6th Fleet, leading up to the battle of Armageddon.47 He claims these cataclysmic events indicate the imminent return of Jesus Christ to be the King of the Jews who will rule over the other nations from the rebuilt Jewish temple on the site of the destroyed Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem.48

 4.1 The Jews of the Bible and the Modern State of Israel

  Lindsey's empathy for the Jews is vividly revealed in his description of a visit to the Western Wall.

Nevertheless, Lindsey is emphatic in holding to a dispensational distinction between the Church and Israel, although the origins of this theological position are never discussed, nor is it named in his writings. Like other dispensationalists, though, Lindsey insists that the promises made to Abraham are unconditional and eternal and that it is the State of Israel rather than merely people of Jewish descent who are the beneficiaries today.

Rather than apply these ancient promises to the Jewish people generally, Lindsey quite specifically, and increasingly overtly applies them to the State of Israel and Israeli citizens.

According to classical dispensationalists, such as Schuyler English, who revised the Scofield Reference Bible in 1967, Israel as a State will have no prophetic significance during the 'church age' until after the so-called 'rapture'.

  Lindsey believes, as a dispensationalist, that Daniel 9:24-27 teaches,

  ...this amazing prediction of the future events of Israel's career sets forth a divinely ordained time period of 'seventy weeks' of years (490 years) in which God would, in specific ways, deal with the sin of the nation, bring in everlasting righteousness, and send the Messiah to the world. This allotted time period was like a great divine 'time-clock'... Countdown began clicking off April, 444 B.C.E... Then Daniel predicted a strange thing. He said that after sixty-nine weeks of years (483 years) had clicked off on this allotment of time, the Messiah of Israel would be revealed to the Jews and then killed, and the city of Jerusalem and their Temple would be destroyed and their 490 year special time allotment would be temporarily cut short by 7 years...

Lindsey does not explain how to fit the nearly 1878 year gap between 70 A.D. and 1948 into Daniel 9:24-27. The seven years he claims is still 'allotted' to Israel during which they will be purged is really a euphemism for the 'tribulation' in which Lindsey believes many Israeli's will suffer and die in the nuclear war of Armageddon.

He also believes that Moses predicted two different destructions of Israel apparently in Deuteronomy 28:49-57 and 28:62-66.

  Lindsey claims these verses teach that,

  Just before the Hebrews conquered the Promised Land, Moses predicted that Israel would twice be destroyed as a nation and twice be driven out of the land because of persistent unbelief. He also predicted that the first destruction and dispersion would come by the hand of one mighty nation. He specifically predicted that in this dispersion the Israelites would be taken captive into this one invading nation (Deuteronomy 28:49-57). This prophecy was fulfilled when the Babylonians destroyed Jerusalem in 586 B.C. And took the survivors back to Babylon as slaves (2 Chronicles 36:9-21)...

Lindsey neglects to point out that the warnings uttered by Moses in Deuteronomy 28 were not predictions of future events but conditional warnings, dependent on whether the Israelites kept the covenant. In between the two passages Lindsey quotes, Moses also warned that the Israelites would suffer all the plagues witnessed in Egypt if they were disobedient, something Lindsey conveniently ignores.

The verses Lindsey quotes do not actually specify that the Israelites will be taken captive 'into this one invading nation', nor that two distinct dispersions would occur. The reference in Deuteronomy 28:63-66 which Lindsey claims predicts a second universal exile actually goes on two verses later to indicate that Egypt, still a feared and great power in Moses day, would be their return destination. Lindsey's insistence on two dispersions is itself a very selective reading of Jewish history ignoring the earlier Assyrian conquest of Tiglath-Pileser in 721 B.C. when the ten tribes of the Northern kingdom were deported and absorbed into other parts of the Assyrian Empire.

Instead of following the position of Schuyler English and other traditional dispensationalists, Lindsey develops his own innovative scheme claiming that there is great significance in the events of 1948 and especially 1967. Quite simply, he insists, 'The center of the entire prophetic forecast is the State of Israel.'55

In 1970, In The Late Great Planet Earth, under the sub-title 'Keys to the Prophetic Puzzle', Lindsey explained why his interpretation of contemporary events concerning Israel is more reliable than previous attempts. Then in 1980 Lindsey reiterated this conviction more dogmatically, insisting the 'rebirth' of Israel to be the only 'sign' that the 'countdown' to Armageddon had begun.

Schuyler English (1972) Hal Lindsey (1980)
    Many Bible students in recent years have tried to fit the events of World War I and II to the prophetic signs which would herald the imminent return of Christ. Their failure discredited prophecy... It is because of these unscriptural attempts at calculating days that some eyebrows rise when we speak of Bible prophecy today.
    The one event which many Bible students in the past overlooked was this paramount prophetic sign: Israel had to be a nation again in the land of its forefathers.56
Many skeptics point out that during World War I and II, some well-meaning students of prophecy claimed that the end of history was at hand and the Messiah would return soon... Naturally, when the world didn't end, all prophecy was discredited. These skeptics have asked me, 'Why do you think that all the various prophecies will come to pass during this generation? The answer is simple. The prophets told us that the rebirth of Israel-no other event-would be the sign that the countdown had begun. Since that rebirth, the rest of the prophecies have begun to be fulfilled quite rapidly. For this reason I am convinced that we are now in the unique time so clearly and precisely forecast by the Hebrew prophets.57

Lindsey bases his interpretation of contemporary events largely on the prophecies of Ezekiel 37-39. Most commentators see in these chapters the prediction of the return of the remnant from Babylon under Ezra and Nehemiah.58 Lindsey, however, chooses instead to apply them to 1948.

Similarly, whereas first Century Christians understood Jesus to be warning them to flee because of the imminent destruction of Jerusalem, Lindsey claims that Jesus was predicting the restoration of the Jews to Palestine in the 20th Century.

Nothing, however, in Matthew 24:32 indicates that Jesus intended his hearers to understand him to be promising that Israel would become a nation again. The New Testament is silent on the question of whether the Jews would ever become a nation state again. Nevertheless, Lindsey has popularised the notion that the re-gathering of the Jews to Palestine since 1948 is the fulfilment of biblical prophecy. Lindsey speaks repeatedly of the 'rebirth'61 of Israel, insisting, 'The nation of Israel cannot be ignored; we see the Jews as a miracle of History.'62

Aware of the justified criticism of other attempts at applying biblical prophecy to contemporary events, Lindsey qualifies his interpretation, but in so doing advocates both a massive secularisation of biblical prophecy as well as a questionable 'second chance' way of salvation for the Jews.

Because he fails to acknowledge the basis and conditions of the covenantal relationship between God and his people, Lindsey makes the fundamental error of assuming promises made to the covenant people of God apply to contemporary Israelis and the modern Jewish State.

In the Bible 'Israel' is not synonymous with the Jewish people but only with those who keep the terms of the covenant. The privileged status of covenant people was taken away from the Jews at some time between Pentecost and the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. While the apostles Peter and Paul could appeal to the historical link between the Jews and their privileges (Acts 3:25; Romans 9:4-5, 11:28), time was running out and there was a limit to that appeal. In the plan of redemptive history, the rejection of the Messiah by the majority of Jewish people led to their rejection under the terms of the covenant. In Acts 3:22-23 Peter applies the Mosaic warning of Deuteronomy 18:15-19 and Leviticus 23:29 to his generation and makes their response to Jesus Christ the critical test.

Likewise, Paul explains how only those who believe in Jesus Christ are now the true children of Abraham.

  Consider Abraham: "He believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness." Understand, then, that those who believe are children of Abraham. The Scripture foresaw that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, and announced the gospel in advance to Abraham: "All nations will be blessed through you." So those who have faith are blessed along with Abraham, the man of faith. (Galatians 3:6-9)

  The New Testament therefore insists on a limit or boundary to the offer of salvation to the Jews as the chosen people of God. This was probably limited to the generation that witnessed the life and ministry of Jesus Christ. Failure to respond to the claims of Jesus Christ led to the removal of the covenant privileges from the Jewish people. Paul goes so far as to describe the consequences as a complete reversal of the status of Jews and Gentiles. 'Jerusalem' symbolic of the Judaism that had rejected Jesus Christ were now regarded by God as the offspring of Hagar not Sarah.

  24These things may be taken figuratively, for the women represent two covenants. One covenant is from Mount Sinai and bears children who are to be slaves: This is Hagar. 25Now Hagar stands for Mount Sinai in Arabia and corresponds to the present city of Jerusalem, because she is in slavery with her children. 26But the Jerusalem that is above is free, and she is our mother... 28Now you, brothers, like Isaac, are children of promise... 30But what does the Scripture say? "Get rid of the slave woman and her son, for the slave woman's son will never share in the inheritance with the free woman's son." 31Therefore, brothers, we are not children of the slave woman, but of the free woman. (Galatians 4:24-31)

  Ignoring the flow of redemptive history, the status of Israel under the terms of the Hebrew covenant, and ultimately the impact of their rejection of Jesus Christ, Lindsey erroneously applies conditional Old Testament promises made to 'Israel' and already fulfilled, unconditionally to the contemporary State of Israel.

  4.2 The Territorial Extent of Eretz Israel

  Zionists clearly see the founding of the State of Israel in 1948 as highly significant, signalling the end of 2000 years of exile. Christian Zionists actively encourage Jews in Russia and Eastern Europe especially, to return to their promised land, seeing this as another 'Exodus'64. In this Lindsey was the first and probably most successful to popularise a Christian Zionist reading of Scripture since 1967.

4.3 The Significance of Jerusalem

Lindsey insists that the repossession of the Old City of Jerusalem in 1967 was another significant sign of the imminent return of the Messiah, since unfulfilled prophecies concerning the Jewish people must occur within the ancient city. He interprets the prophecies of Zechariah 12-14 as foretelling events that are about to happen such as a siege of Jerusalem by the world's armies and great battle at Megiddo.66

4.4 The Rebuilding of the Jewish Temple

Lindsey not only regards the founding of the State of Israel and capture of Jerusalem as the fulfilment of biblical prophecy but insists the Jewish temple will be rebuilt in place of the Dome of the Rock.

Dispensationalists like Lindsey believe in the imminent rebuilding of the Temple based on the somewhat enigmatic passage in Daniel 9:24-27. The sanctuary already appears to have been destroyed in verse 26 yet sacrifices are brought to an end in verse 27 and the one causing the 'abomination that causes desolation' then desecrates the Temple.

  On the basis of a rather tenuous interpretation, Lindsey confidently argues,

  This prophecy speaks of sacrifice and offerings which demand that the Jews rebuild the Temple for the third time upon its original site. At that point, Judaism and Islam will be placed on an inevitable course of war over the site, a war that will start Armageddon. Many prophecies demand rebuilding of the ancient Temple, indicating that the event is a significant prophetic sign (see Matthew 24:15 and 2 Thessalonians 2:3,4). Therefore any move toward that direction is a crucial clue to what hour it is on God's prophetic timetable.70

Lindsey also bases his argument for the rebuilding of the Temple, in part, on the instructions given to the Apostle John to measure the Temple in Revelation 11:1-2.

Lindsey quotes Israel Eldad, an Israeli historian, claiming that devout Jews, 'some of whom are in powerful positions in the Israeli government' expect the Dome of the Rock to be destroyed, whether by natural or supernatural intervention, and the Jewish Temple to be rebuilt very soon after.72 Lindsey quotes Eldad again in his later work.

Clearly Lindsey believed at this stage the Dome of the Rock would need to be destroyed in order for the Jewish Temple to be rebuilt. He even appeared to know the exact location of the former structure.

By 1983 Lindsey had changed his mind about the exact location of the Herodian Temple. Based on the findings of a 16 year investigation undertaken by Dr Kaufman of the Hebrew University into the location of the first and second Temple and published in the Biblical Archaeology Review, Lindsey now claimed,

Having discovered the true site of the Herodian Temple, Lindsey proceeded to find scriptural verification of this new location.

Lindsey's belief in the imminent rebuilding of the Temple ultimately rests on his interpretation of the words of Jesus in Matthew 24.

Although Lindsey's speculations are popular, they bear little relation to the events described by Jesus in Matthew 24. Many commentators note that the predictions of Jesus were fulfilled in the events leading up to the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. when Jewish Zealots desecrated the temple using it as a fortress against the Romans. Eusebius, for example, the 4th Century Bishop and historian refers to the eye witness accounts of Josephus, the Jewish historian of the 1st Century, to show how these predictions of Jesus had already been fulfilled.

Lindsey ignores this historical position preferring to interpret Matthew 24 as prophecy still awaiting fulfilment. Despite the fact that Jesus warned that these events would be witnessed by 'this generation' (Matthew 24:34), Lindsey understand 'this' to be his own generation.79

4.5 The Implacable Enemies of Israel: Communism and Islam

  Ezekiel, Daniel and Zechariah all said that a nation to the extreme north of Israel would achieve great influence and become a threat to the whole world. They said this power would be Israel's mortal enemy. The prophets predicted that this nation would launch an all-out land and sea attack on Israel, the Arab nations and the continent of Africa. This country, Bible scholars agree, is the Soviet Union. A line drawn due north of Israel crosses only one land mass - Russia. And the three tribes Ezekiel predicted would people the nation to the north are in fact the ancestors of today's Russians. Throughout its history, the single most consistent motive of the Soviet Union's military invasions has been the acquisition of warm water ports for its merchant and naval fleets. 80

Although confident, if novel in his application of ancient biblical prophecy to current world events, Lindsey's speculations concerning Russia show remarkable similarity to those of earlier Dispensationalists such as Arno Gaebelein.

Arno Gaebelein (1916)
    Hal Lindsey (1980)
The time cannot be far off when Russia's millions, augmented by the armies that she will gather from these and other nations, will be thrown by their rulers into Palestine in order to destroy the nation of the Jews.82
    ...I predicted that the Soviets would begin their Middle East campaign with a sweep through the Persian Gulf area into Iran. The recent Russian invasion of Afghanistan was a first step in that direction.83...to utterly destroy the Jewish people.84

In 1980 Lindsey could confidently assert,

While believing Russia has this preordained destiny to dominate the world, attack Israel and precipitate a nuclear holocaust, Lindsey nevertheless berates successive American governments for allowing the Russians to gain this military superiority. He does not explain how on the one hand he believes this to be the fulfilment of biblical prophecy yet on the other hand finds it 'incomprehensible'.

He then provides five pages of graphs to show how Russia had gained military superiority over the United States in conventional forces, tactical aircraft, military personnel, combat ships, tanks, artillery, anti-ballistic missiles, interceptor aircraft, strategic bombers and nuclear warheads.87 Sounding remarkably like an ultra-conservative Republican, Lindsey laments,

Lindsey repeats this contradiction, berating the U.S. Government for allowing the Russians to gain superiority while at the same time claiming this to be their divinely determined destiny.

Uncomfortably for Lindsey they soon became 'yesterdays' headlines also. With the gradual demise of Russia as a world power and the disintegration of her communist empire, Lindsey began to switch his emphasis onto Islam as the real threat to Israel and world peace.

Throughout his books, but increasingly in the latter editions, Lindsey repeatedly denigrates and demonises the Arab nations and Palestinians, in particular. He shows little understanding and even less compassion for their plight. His superficial assessment of their motivation is typical of other Christian Zionists.

'...their common desire to destroy the newly-formed nation of Israel.'90

  'All Moslems see Israel as their enemy'91

  The Arab nations are united in their fanatical obsession to destroy Israel.92

  4.6 The Rise and Fall of the United States

  A popular view among Christian Zionists is the belief that God will continue to bless America as long as she remains an ally of Israel. Lindsey is no exception.

  Except for the U.S., Israel has no allies... We are still Israel's friend. But there are strong pressures from within to turn away from Israel. I pray that we do not, for our friendship with the Israelis is one of the reasons we've survived as a nation.94

Lamenting the isolation the United States experiences in the United Nations when vetoing censure motions against Israel, Lindsey points out,

  Up to the time of the 1991 Madrid Conference, the Arabs were 'called upon' to 'comply,' 'desist,' 'refrain' etc. four times. Israel was 'demanded,' ordered,' etc. to do General Assembly bidding three hundred and five times. The UN voted six hundred and five resolutions between its inception and the Gulf War. Four hundred and twenty nine of those resolutions, or, sixty-two percent of the total of the UN's resolutions were against Israel or its interests.95

  Lindsey seems to delight in finding obscure references to the United States in the Bible. So, for example in interpreting Revelation 12:13-17, he claims that the reference to '...the woman were given two wings of a great eagle, so that she might fly into the wilderness...' actually describes 'some massive airlift' that will transport escaping Jewish believers from the holocaust of Armageddon to the safety of places like Petra.

  Lindsey does not explain why the symbolism of the eagle should be applied to the United States instead of to any one of a number of countries like Germany or the Czech Republic who also include an eagle as part of their national emblem. Nor does Lindsey explain why on this occasion the reference to the eagle should be understood as describing to modern aircraft and not in other passages mentioning the wings of eagles, such as Exodus 19:4, Deuteronomy 32:11-12 or Isaiah 40:31. Such sensationalist speculation hardly corroborates Lindsey's claim to hold to a consistent literal hermeneutic.

Despite this important role in supporting Israel, Lindsey does not see a hopeful future for the United States. In the 1980's when he berated the U.S. Administration for allowing Russia to gain apparent military superiority, Lindsey described America as, 'a second-class military power.'97 According to Lindsey there were several stark choices before the American people.

That fourth option is elaborated under the heading 'The More Important Duty.' Lindsey claims that God has preserved the United States as a 'free country' for four reasons. These include the presence of a large community of 'true believers'; their support for missionaries around the world; their commitment to prayer; and,
The Late Great Planet Earth (1970)104 Israel and the Last Days (1983)105
Phase I: Pan Arabic assault & Russian amphibious assault.

 

 

 

 

 

Phase II: Russian Confederacy counterattack Middle East into Egypt (Daniel 11:40-42)

 

Phase III: Russian Confederacy initiates conquest of Africa, attacking to the West and South.

 

Phase IV: Russian commander hears tidings out of the 'East' (Orient mobilizing) and out of the 'North' (Roman confederacy mobilizing) and regroups his troops. (Daniel 11:43-45)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Phase V: Russian army returns to Israel from Egypt and is destroyed there.

Map 1: King of the South. Pan-Arabic Armies Attack Israel (Daniel 11:40).

 

Map 2: King of the North. The Soviet Union Launches an All-Out Invasion. (Daniel 11:40-45)

 

Phases 1 & 2: Soviets and their allies launch massive invasion from land, sea and air.

 

Phase 3: Soviets launch lightning attack on Strait of Hormuz from Afghanistan to close off oil from Persian Gulf.

 

Phase 4. Soviet navy makes large amphibious invasion. Hits hard and lands at Haifa, gateway to the Valley of Armageddon. Also lands on shores of Egypt.

 

Soviet commander moves rapidly through Israel on his way to Egypt and prepares to take Africa (See Daniel 11:42-44.)

 

Map 3: Armies of the East and West. China and Ten Nations of Europe Counterattack (Revelation 16:12, Daniel 11:44)... The Soviets are totally destroyed.

 

Map 4: The Messiah Comes. Blood Shall Stand to the Horses Bridles (Revelation 14:19-20).

99 Lindsey, 1980's., p. 158.

100 Lindsey, Late., p. 96.

101 Lindsey, There's., p. 194.

102 Lindsey, 1980's., p. 15.

103 Lindsey, 1980's., p. 104.

104 Lindsey, Late., pp. 155-159

105 Lindsey, Israel., pp.37-44.

106 Lindsey, Late., p. 156.

107 Lindsey, Late., p. 156.

108 Lindsey, Israel., p. 19.

109 Lindsey, Late., p. 157.

110 Lindsey, 1980's., p. 13.

111 Lindsey, 1980's., p. 47.

112 Lindsey, 1980's., p. 63.

113 Lindsey, 1980's., p. 68.

114 National Review (19 November 1990) 49, cited in Demar, Last., p. 200.

115 'Artswatch,' World (2 March 1991), 15, quoted in Gary Demar, Last Days Madness, Obsession of the Modern Church (Atlanta, Georgia, American Vision, 1997), p. 107.

116 Lindsey, 1980's., p. 37.

117 Lindsey, 1980's., p. 39.

118 Lindsey, Late., p. 160.

119 Lindsey, Late., p. 71.

120 Lindsey, There's., p. 215.

121 Lindsey, There's., p. 230.

122 Lindsey, There's., p. 237.

123 Lindsey, There's., p. 238.

124 Lindsey, Late., p. 44.

125 Lindsey, Late., p. 136.

126 Lindsey, Late., pp. 48, 165, 167.

127 Lindsey, There's., p. 121.

128 Lindsey, 1980's., p. 45.

129 Lindsey, Israel., pp. 45-46.

130 Hal Lindsey, The 1980's: Countdown to Armageddon (New York, Bantam, 1982), back cover.

131 Hal Lindsey, The 1980's: Countdown to Armageddon (Basingstoke, Lakeland, 1983), back cover.

132 Lindsey, Late., p. 54.

133 Lindsey, 1980's., back page.

134 Lindsey, 1980's., p. 162.

135 Lindsey, Israel., p. 47.

136 Lindsey, 1980's., pp. 29-30.

137 Demar, Last., p. 331. See also http://www.bible.ca/pre-earthquakes-history-data.htm

138 Lindsey, 1980's., p. 29.

139 Thomas D. Ice, 'Dispensationalism, Date-Setting and Distortion,' Biblical Perspectives (September/October, 1988), p. 1.

140 Gary DeMar & Peter J. Leithart, The Legacy of Hatred Continues, A Response to Hal Lindsey's The Road to Holocaust, (Tyler, Texas, Institute for Christian Economics, 1989), p. 31.

141 cited in C. Van der Waal, Hal Lindsey and Biblical Prophecy (Neerlandia, Alberta, Canada, Inheritance Publications, 1991), p. 14.

142 Lindsey, Late., p. 113.

143 Lindsey, 1980's., p. 15.

144 Lindsey, 1980's., p. 109.

145 Lindsey, Late., p. 67.

146 Samuele Bacciochi, Hal Lindsey's Prophetic Jigsaw Puzzle, Five Predictions That Failed (Berrien Springs, Biblical Perspectives); Gary DeMar & Peter J. Leithart, The Legacy of Hatred Continues, A Response to Hal Lindsey's The Road to Holocaust, (Tyler, Texas, Institute for Christian Economics, 1989); Kenneth Gentry, 'Dispensationalism's Achilles' Head: Comments on Hal Lindsey's The Road to Holocaust' Dispensationalism in Transition, Institute of Christian Economics, Vol II, No. 8 & 9, 1989; Steve Schlissel & David Brown, Hal Lindsey and the Restoration of the Jews (Edmonton, Alberta, Still Waters Revival Books, 1990); Curtis Crenshaw, a review of Steve Schlissel & David Brown, Hal Lindsey and the Restoration of the Jews (Edmonton, Alberta, Still Waters Revival Books, 1990) Contra Mundum No. 3, Spring 1992.; C. Van der Waal, Hal Lindsey and Biblical Prophecy, (Neerlandia, Alberta, Inheritance Publications, 1991); Stephen O'Leary, Arguing the Apocalypse: A Theory of Millennial Rhetoric (Oxford, Oxford University Press); John Mann, a review of Stephen O'Leary's, Arguing the Apocalypse: A Theory of Millennial Rhetoric (Oxford, Oxford University Press), http://homepages.anglianet.co.uk/johnm/apoc.html . See also Dispensationalism in Transition (Institute of Christian Economics, Tyler, Texas); Center for the Refutation of Dispensational Falsehoods (CRDF) web site: http://village.ios.com/~dougg/biblstud/crdf/crdf.htm ; Contra Mundum web site: http://www.wavefront.com/~contra_M/cm/reviews.cm03_rev_jewish.html ;

147 Blaising & Bock, Dispensationalism., pp. 14-15.

148 Gary DeMar and Peter J. Leithart, The Legacy of Hatred Continues: A response to Hal Lindsey's The Road to Holocaust (Tyler, Texas, Institute for Christian Economics, 1989), p. 17.

149 Lindsey, Road., back page. Refuted by Gary DeMar and Peter J. Leithart, The Legacy of Hatred Continues: A Response to Hal Lindsey's The Road to Holocaust (Fort Worth, Dominion Press, 1989)

150 Lindsey, Road., p. 3

151 Hal Lindsey, The Dominion Theology Heresy, Tape 217, 1987, quoted in DeMar & Leithart, Legacy., p. viii.

152 Harold O. J. Brown, Heresies: The Image of Christ in the Mirror of Heresy and Orthodoxy from the Apostles to the Present (Garden City, New York, Doubleday, 1984), p. 455, note 38.

153 Gary DeMar and Peter J. Leithart, Legacy., p. 25.

154 S. Lewis Johnson, 'The Paralaysis of Legalism' Bibliotheca Sacra (April/June 1963), p. 109. Cited in Gary DeMar and Peter J. Leithart, The Legacy., p. 24.

155 Lindsey, Late., p. 151.

156 Hal Lindsey, The Final Battle (Palos Verdes, Western Front, 1995), pp. 250-252; Israel and the Last Days (Eugene, Oregon, Harvest House, 1983), pp. 20-30.

157 Hal Lindsey, There's a New World Coming (New York, Bantam Books, 1984, p. 90.

158 Lindsey, Late., pp. 81-82.

159 Lindsey, Late., p. 76.

160 Lindsey, 1980's., p. 45.

161 Gary DeMar and Peter J. Leithart, The Legacy of Hatred Continues: A response to Hal Lindsey's The Road to Holocaust (Tyler, Texas, Institute for Christian Economics, 1989), p. 27.